Center for Research Libraries - Global Resources Network

Resources for

Landscape Architecture and the “Rural” Cemetery Movement

Patricia J. Finney
Head, Stack Management Department, CRL


Image from The Cemetery Hand Book: A Manual of Useful Information on Cemetery Development and Management (Chicago: Allied Arts Pub. Co., [1921]). From CRL collections.

Formal burial in the United States, prior to 1860, was primarily restricted to interment of the body on the grounds of a church or meetinghouse, or occasionally within the church itself. The bell of the church was rung during the last hours of life, and after death, in an effort to keep evil spirits at bay, and to give the departing soul some advantage upon its way. The body was, in English tradition, placed in a casket. Graves were laid facing east and west, with the head to the west; all available space was used, with burials very close together, and at times on top of each other. As burial was within the church yard, tombstones were commonly seen on meeting day, reminding the congregation of the dead, and again, of death’s inevitability. Headstones were, if afforded, carved with representations such as death’s head or Father Time extinguishing the candle of life; and also carried verbal warnings of mortality, and of the necessity for virtue, such as: “Fugit hora” (time flies) and “Memento mori” (remember that you must die). Cemeteries were dreary places affording little room or light for vegetation, and thereby not encouraging the passerby to linger and to appreciate.

As the 19th century progressed, towns grew to cities, and population increased proportionally. For reasons of public health and overcrowding, burial grounds began to be located outside of population centers, no longer on church ground. These cemeteries spawned the “Rural” Cemetery Movement, beginning in 1831 with Mount Auburn, Boston; Laurel Hill, Philadelphia (1836); Greenwood, N.Y. (1838); Lowell, Mass. (1841); Evergreen, Portland, Maine (1855); Forest Hill, Madison, Wisc. (1858); and countless others as the country and movement expanded.

The rural cemetery was designed with romantic vision, based upon English landscape gardening. Nature, in contrast to an increasingly urban setting, was idealized and sought out; cemeteries, located close to the city, were consciously designed to provide sanctuary, solitude, quiet, adornment, and beauty. It was common, especially on Sundays, for full families to picnic in cemeteries “taking long walks in the peaceful setting, thinking about the past and the future, and keeping a little bit of history alive for themselves.”1

The development of Forest Hill Cemetery in Madison, Wisc., is illustrative of the movement. The city purchased the property in 1857 and appointed a Cemetery Commission; Forest Hill was considered a source of civic pride and tasks dedicated to beautification were undertaken. From 1858 to 1890, a gate and fence were built; trees were planted; a receiving vault, well, windmill, chapel and streetcar waiting station were added. The Wisconsin State Journal of October 30, 1906, as a new campaign to gather money for improvements to the cemetery was initiated, stated:

Forest Hill Cemetery, the resting place of Madison’s dead, is to receive the serious attention of skilled landscape gardeners and architects, and to be made into a place of beauty, like the cemeteries of most of our larger cities. The transforming touch which has so admirably cooperated with nature in creating a Madison beautiful is now to fall upon God’s acre and set it in order according to the latest and most approved methods of cemetery keeping. . . . The improvements contemplate a handsome iron fence along the front, a deeply recessed entrance, macadamized roads, planting of more flowers and shrubbery to give greater beauty and privacy, in fact a general rehabilitation of these grounds.2

As early as 1857 the agricultural magazine The Country Gentleman addressed the specific planting requirements for the new style of cemetery: “cemeteries are not to be left naked and desolate, as were most of the old-fashioned burying yards . . . we conclude that a cemetry [sic] should be a pleasant, cultivated scene . . . the grounds should be substantially enclosed with fences or hedges and belts of trees, to give them an air of security and seclusion . . . and to make them appear to be a suitable restingplace and home for the dead.”3

Extensive discussion of landscape development for such cemeteries has cited the need for green grass, flowers, shrubs, and trees to form “a harmonious effect, pleasing to the eye.”4 The cemetery entrance with its hardware and plantings “should be so pleasing that visitors will wish to be buried therein.” Trees were a necessity, including evergreens: spruce and pines, and deciduous varieties: excepting those which are messy, rapid growers, or unsuitable to the area; “avoid the Weeping Mulberry, for a cemetery contains enough things to suggest sorrow without enhancing this feature in the landscape.” Flowering shrubs, massed, were highly recommended including: lilac, snowberry, hydrangea, forsythias, honeysuckle, dogwood, and verbena among the many. Flowers: perennial, annual, and even ornamental grasses, again massed, were desirable with varieties such as phlox, hollyhock, poppy, geranium, salvia, and roses leading the lists.

Advertisement from Modern Cemetery (March 1, 1891). From American Periodicals from the Center for Research Libraries.

It has been argued that the rural cemetery, serving as an oasis within the expanding urban and industrial landscape of the country, actually became the foundation of the American park movement.5 Leaving the city and seeking rural beauty had its merits, but was not available to all, while a public mall or promenade, centrally located in the city itself, would serve more of the citizenry. By the end of the 19th century, the role of the cemetery as a place of escape from the city had been supplanted by the establishment of parks, and by the blurring of city and country as suburbia evolved. Natural sanctuary became rare as “sprawl” increased and landscape homogenized. Again, lost was the place of beauty in which ease of tensions could be found; again, a new movement evolved; this time, the wilderness movement.

Several works in CRL’s collection offer further information on this subject, including the following monographs (all available online):

The following serials from CRL’s collection, dedicated to cemetery landscaping, are available online in American Periodicals from the Center for Research Libraries (APCRL, see p. 4):

  • Modern Cemetery (1891). [1891]–[1893]
  • Park and Cemetery (1895). [1895]–[1900]
  • Park and Cemetery (1932). [1932]
  • Park and Cemetery and Landscape Gardening. [1900]–1931

 


Sources:

Bender, Thomas. “The “Rural” Cemetery Movement: Urban Travail and the Appeal of Nature.” New England Quarterly. Vol. 47, No. 2 (June 1947): 196–211.

Forest Hill Cemetery Committee of Historic Madison, Inc. A Biographical Guide to Forest Hill Cemetery: Madison, WI. Madison, Wisc.: Historic Madison, 1996.

Weed, Howard Evarts. Modern Park Cemeteries. Chicago: R. J. Haight, 1912.

  • 1. Forest Hill Cemetery Committee of Historic Madison, Inc. A Biographical Guide to Forest Hill Cemetery: Madison, Wisconsin (Madison, Wisc.: Historic Madison, Inc., 1996), vii.
  • 2. Ibid.
  • 3. The Country Gentleman, November 1857: 10, 19. From American Periodicals from the Center for Research Libraries.
  • 4. Howard Evarts Weed, Modern Park Cemeteries (Chicago: R. J. Haigt, 1912), 71–83.
  • 5. Thomas Bender, “The “Rural” Cemetery Movement: Urban Travail and the Appeal of Nature,” New England Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 2 (June 1947): 206–11.